(818) 552-4503

Automatic temporary restraining orders that are in effect upon commencement of divorce

It is typical, if not natural, for parties to a divorce case to start hiding assets and income from each other as soon as divorce is anticipated.  Spouses are thinking ahead of the game on how they can outsmart the other spouse so that they end up with the larger portion of the pie.

This is a common reaction by clients not knowing that they are violating the automatic temporary restraining orders (ATROS) that are automatically in place the moment divorce is commenced.  I thought it would be important for family law litigants to be aware of ATROS so they can avoid a violation and the consequences of such violation.

ATROS takes effect on the Petitioner upon filing the Petition and summons while it takes effect on the Respondent upon service of the Petition under family Code Section 233(a) and 2040(a).  ATROS is not limited to divorce cases but also apply to legal separation actions and Nullity actions.  ATROS stays in effect until entry of the final judgment in the case.

The four standard mutual restraining orders are 1) removing their minor children from the state without the prior written consent of the other party or a court order. family code Section 2040(a)(1)   2) restraint  from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating, concealing, or in any way disposing of any property, real or personal, whether community, quasi-community, or separate without the other party’s written consent or court order; fam code 2040(a)(2)  3) restraint from cashing, borrowing against, canceling, transferring, disposing of, or changing the beneficiaries of any insurance or other coverage, including life, health, automobile, and disability held for the benefit of the parties and their child for whom support may be orders.  Fam C 2040(a)(3).   4)  restraint from creating a nonprobate transfer or modifying a nonprobate transfer in a manner that affects the disposition of property subject to the transfer without the other party’s written consent or court order.  fam c 2040(a)(4).

There are exceptions to the above restrictions.  One exception is for property transfers in the usual course of business or for the necessities of life.  Examples would be property transfers as part of your usual business operations or to pay for usual household living expenses. Another exception is payment of reasonable attorney’s fees. fam c. 2040(a)(2).

A violation of restraint against property transfer may be remedied by awarding the aggrieved spouse his/her 50% of the community property that the spouse would have received had the property not been transferred pursuant to Marriage of McTiernan and Fam. C 1101(g).   A violation of the child move away restriction is punishable by fine and/ or imprisonment pursuant to Penal. Code 278.5.  A violation of the other ATROS restrictions is punishable  by contempt, fine, and/ or imprisonment pursuant to Penal Code 273.6.  It is important for family law litigant’s to steer clear from violating the ATROS.


Attorney Kenneth Ursua Reyes is a Certified Family Law Specialist.  He was President of the Philippine American Bar Association.  He is a member of both the Family law section and Immigration law section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.  He is a graduate of Southwestern University Law School in Los Angeles and California State University, San Bernardino School of Business Administration.  He has extensive CPA experience prior to law practice. LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH REYES, P.C. is located at 3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA, 90010.  Tel. (213) 388-1611 or e-mail  HYPERLINK “mailto:kureyeslaw@aol.com” kureyeslaw@aol.com.  Visit our website at  kenreyeslaw.com. â– 

About the Author